Thread:Digifiend/@comment-1400041-20140509224246/@comment-1400041-20140510010153

Digifiend wrote: What about the non-animal rangers? Are you suggesting we have a racing car themed rangers category? Ambulance themed rangers? Soviet themed rangers (of which there's only one)? Heart themed rangers (as in the playing card - again there's only one)? Some rangers cannot be placed into such a category at all, such as the Gorengers and Gokaigers. Then as some Rangers have no power-up, so we should not have Super Rangers category? I'm pretty sure that number of Super Rangers is lower than number of animal-motif Rangers.

Nbajammer wrote: I'm afraid you are very badly mistaken if you think an unnecessary category with animals is more important than the blatantly obviously impotant color category given the clear and forthcoming natures associated with the colors red, blue, and pink. Colors are categories because of those natures not because of motif. One ranger having a lion motif vs another who does not have a lion motif does not make the one with a lion motif more important. A ranger being red versus, say, green, does. So again I ask you - why are you so persistant that an animal category is needed when it clearly is not? We can have "Sentai Sword-users", we can have "Sentai Rangers with Mecha forms", we can have "Non-human Sentai Ranger", but we cannot have Sentai Lion and stuffs?

Needed or not, it is useful information, somebody would need to read it sometime. Redundancy is better than shortage, as long as it is well-organized.