Thread:Digifiend/@comment-1400041-20140509224246/@comment-691135-20140510002627

I'm afraid you are very badly mistaken if you think an unnecessary category with animals is more important than the blatantly obviously impotant color category given the clear and forthcoming natures associated with the colors red, blue, and pink. Colors are categories because of those natures not because of motif. One ranger having a lion motif vs another who does not have a lion motif does not make the one with a lion motif more important. A ranger being red versus, say, green, does. So again I ask you - why are you so persistant that an animal category is needed when it clearly is not?