Thread:AkaNinger/@comment-691135-20150712025719/@comment-691135-20150712062741

I'm not going to go in circles with you on the merits of whether you think a block is appropriate or not. It matters only whether I or other administrators do. And if it has to be done to prevent a continual remove/revert cycle as was brewing, then it will be done. Again instead of asking why your removal was reverted, you assumed it was in error and re-removed valid information. That's not the proper way to handle that situation (and this is the second time I'm saying this). Now let's look at the facts here. Saika tells Takaharu to give up on taming Shishi-Oh, but it is clear from scans that Takaharu gets a new form (Chouzetsu) and mecha (Lion Ha-Oh) pretty much tells you that Shishi-Oh is going to get tamed. It may not say HOW, but it does say that it DOES. This is why you need to do your research instead of saying it's inaccurate, and why removing it was wrong (some could argue vandalism, but I think you were simply misinformed). But again, instead of asking why it was restored you repeated your action on the exact same grounds. If I didn't step in and stop it by stating further edit warring would result in a block, it would have continued. So again, it was absolutely warranted and I expect the edit warring to stop.

Thread closed.