Thread:AkaNinger/@comment-691135-20150712025719/@comment-691135-20150712061220

If I didn't block you for edit warring, it would give you - and other editors - the impression that it is okay to do so and there would be a never-ending cycle of remove/revert/remove/revert. So no, that's not hostile nor is it an inappropriate tone (nor does either matter). Whether he gave reasons the first time or not, it does/did not keep you from asking why it was restored. You have to take the initiative to find these things out instead of resorting to actions that are frowned on. And just because something seems inaccurate - or let's say it is inaccurate for the sake of making a point - removing it is not the correct way to deal with it. Correcting it, in the case of actual error, would be. Because we see the episodic previews, because users scan and post the information from the magazines and catalogs, we do know things ahead of time. And with regard to the synopsis in question, anyone who saw Shinobi 19 (myself included) would conclude that, given the events therein, 20 would have them securing the services of the new mecha. So why that would not be accurate given the facts we know is something I couldn't tell you. But constantly removing info just because you think it is wrong is not acceptable.