Thread:Dchallofjustice/@comment-691135-20141120211404/@comment-691135-20141121020628

You aren't posting a source because you take WHAT seriously? A phrase from the sound a toy makes? If you truly took it seriously you would have left well enough alone, but you were apparently okay with breaking the rule to do so. As far as sourcing a toy - Raz already did. He did that when he made his post. Which was in turn cited by two other sources. It's like saying we can't cite Wikipedia, but if Wikipedia cites a source that IS credible, then that source CAN be cited. But in this case we don't need to cite the toy, because that citation is passed along.

As for myself and the rules, if you would have simply stated "I'm sorry Jammer, I shouldn't have made those changes without providing a source like I know I'm supposed to. I was simply having a hard time finding the appropriate source to cite." then none of that. I've yet to break a rule on this wiki and I don't intend to start doing so now for your own enjoyment. How much or how little I write is up to me - not the rules. If that's the best you got to try to take shots at me, then there must really be something wrong with you. If you were truly trying to truncate the issue, all that had to be done was this:

"I'm sorry Jammer, I shouldn't have made those changes without providing a source like I know I'm supposed to. I was simply having a hard time finding the appropriate source to cite."

But I don't see you doing that. I see you behaving very childishly, pointing fingers at me while referencing a so-called "primary source" that never seems to get produced. If this so-called "primary source" exists, why have you not provided it for the umpteen times I've asked for a source to back up your claims? I am already beginning to believe this "primary source" does not exist!

And yes, I do insist the vote is not necessary - 1) The YouTube clip clearly uses terms such as "Pink Ranger", which validates the already-verbatim term as used since MMPR; 2) The Clip was of a Saban-produced panel introducing Dino Charge, which makes it OFFICIAL; 3) The fact that generic terms such as "Red Ranger" often get changed later to something more specific (such as "Ranger Red") - which will not happen until at least the first episode airs and it clearly has not. Since we have the verbatim term used for 21 years, and an official panel captured on video using that term, that validates the term as correct. Whether something more official will come later or not remains to be seen. But the terms you wanted to use are wrong and unsupported. I even broke down the call for you:

"Spino Charger, Engage! Energize! Unleash The Power! Spinosaurus Power Ranger Talon!"

(Spino Charger) and (Spinosaurus)/(Spinosaurus Power) are the source of the ranger's power. (Power Ranger Talon)/(Ranger Talon) is the designation. But we do not have an official term for the members yet outside of the verbatim - the verbatim for this is "Talon Ranger" - the very name on the page!

Why you choose not to see all this is beyond me - as is why you seem to feel like if you can't get your way that you need to start trouble. And you are right, my say is not the be-all-end-all. Because unlike you, I don't claim it to be. And I provide sources for my edits as well, something you seem unable or unwilling to do.