Thread:Nbajammer/@comment-11502008-20170201053834/@comment-691135-20170201222017

It really doesn't matter whether it's known at the time or not - any new information requires a citation and the edit I reverted had no citation, which makes it false by definition. In other words, if there's no citation it is assumed to be false information since we only post facts. If a scan exists, then a source exists which can and must be cited. Really, there's nothing but false it could be when a citation is required but not provided.