Thread:Digifiend/@comment-5065652-20170922063108/@comment-8055391-20171004224909

Digifiend wrote: I haven't seen the movie either - but I don't think it matters for this query. ... Agreed, because there was nothing in the movie that gives off any indication as to who it is. Not to mention, we’ve only gotten one movie, so that alone isn’t enough just like how one episode usually isn’t enough to determine an SIC.

Digifiend wrote: ... If you can't be certain about who the second in command is, don't label anyone as that role. Something this user needs to understand. I’ve had to revert his edits to the SIC categories multiple times (nat at the same time, thankfully) since the majority of those edits were baseless assumptions, some before the show even airs.

Honestly, I wish there was a set-in-stone way of determining who an SIC is, even when it isn’t directly established in in the season.