Thread:Digi/@comment-1398253-20170221185939/@comment-691135-20170221190557

I agree with Digifiend. Simply saying so-and-so returned and nothing else doesn't add any flavor or context to the article. The information wasn't wrong, it merely expanded on why they returned and the presumed circumstances under which it happened (as we are never told, and going off facts is the only way it could happen). And then the Storylink citation. I too see no reason for them to be reverted.