Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-4401685-20130802113259/@comment-675805-20130903034856

Digi wrote: I've checked with Mizuho Nogawa, and here was her response on the subject:

"If i remember correctly it was a photoshop filter. The original physical suit was poorly made and ripped pretty badly."

- Mizuho Nogawa

So there was a suit but it wasn't used. I see... not exactly sure how you'd apply photoshop filter but that's not important.

Nbajammer wrote: Mattwo wrote: I'm saying you have no proof there isn't a suit.

Come to think of it, I'm not sure why I said that needs to be fixed, it's nothing but fan speculation and with the way it's worded and placed on the page that kind of thing is still encyclopedic.

This is my mistake. I apologize.

I have logical proof, but you have no proof there is a suit. Which was my point all along.

Logic on it's own isn't proof. It can not be anything more than conjecture without actual evidence, you handled the conjecture as you should have, thus as I said there is actually nothing to fix, and that's all that is important to the wiki, isn't it?

Of course, we now have an official word, which is good enough as evidence. I have updated Magis' trivia section to append this new information.